Catching up on reform - a challenge to economists



Just followed an APWLD  webinar on the WTO and COVID19.  I had also followed a Groundviews podcast where Sanjana H interviewed Anush Wijesinha, a young Sri Lankan trade economist.  Anush’s core argument seemed to be that Sri Lanka lacked the fiscal space to respond to the pandemic and its aftermath because we were too late to implement the reforms that we should have had in place.  I am not clear what exactly those reforms were, but listening to the webinar just now it struck me that it is not so simple. 

The webinar reminded me that WTO regulations on, for example agriculture goods and services, has systematically decimated domestic agriculture in developing countries and challenged food sovereignty and hurt the livelihoods of small farmers. WTO led liberalization and promotion of FDI in agriculture and natural resources has led to land grabs, seed grabs, water grabs, and natural resource grabs.  It would be interested to know from Anush Wijesinha and others what has been the impact of trade agreements and WTO regulations  on Sri Lanka’s food situation.

Another issue that I heard on webinar was about the WTO role in  the commodification of health – where GATS has commodified care, TRIPS has commodified knowledge and health is seen as a tradeable subject.  The Sri Lankan experience buttresses the argument that only countries that were able to protect public health services from the WTO push towards privatizing health services, were able to effectively deal with the Covid19 virus.  So from a trade economist perspective, what does that mean?

 I remember Anush Wijesinha also suggested that we have to rethink the role of the state.  It is interesting that during the pandemic nobody has left everything to the ‘market’ as one is generally advised to do under neoliberalist ideology.
 So given these and other global contextual factors, in the context of Sri Lanka, what ARE  the reforms that we need to catch up on? Is it reform that entrenches us even further in an economic system that the WTO and the world architecture on trade and trade agreements represent, or do we need to work on  instituting reforms that will take us in a different direction?


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Will change come through red gates?

Image
My former schoolmates are pre-ordering their copy of a coffee-table book entitled Through the Red Gates, a celebratory volume of 125 years of Ladies College, the school we attended on Flower Road, which celebrates this landmark event in 2025.   Some former schoolmates (and others) are also agonising at the possibility that the gates to the country’s governance might turn red with a Malimawa/NPP/Anura Kumara Dissanayake victory in the Presidential election next week.   The fear of a NPP/AKD victory takes several forms: it evokes the spectre of violence of the JVP (the main party in the NPP) forgetting that JVP are not the only perpetrators of terror. The political space, since 1 971 at least, has been seeped in violence - the JVP of the 1980s was particularly vicious, but s uccessive state regimes have unleashed state violence and given head to extra-judicial violent e lements that were equally virulent.   As Lionel Bopage has said in a recent interview , the violenc...
Read more

Some thoughts on the White Saviour Complex of development consultancies

Image
photo taken from  https://e11e99.wordpress.com/2012/10/06/identity-in-a-post-colonial-world/ I am sharing some thoughts that I picked  randomly from a relatively progressive Christian facebook page (Sojourners)that I follow, mainly to help me counter the rather misinformed opinions of my true believer Christian friends (brown not white).  The article is called , 6 HARMFUL CONSEQUENCES OF THE WHITE SAVIOR COMPLEX, BY RYAN KUJA  and is so relevant to the northern development consultancy space that many of my (white) friends and colleagues occupy (and that I too sometimes venture into) that I thought to use it to write a blog post that I can share with that community.   R yan Kuja confesses that he was "never a missionary in the standard sense of the word, never proselytized or attempted to save souls"  but admits that "the engine driving [him] was the white saviour complex..... The other Westerners [he] worked with believed [they] had it al...
Read more

Year 2014: Buddhist era 2557-2558

Image
There was an interesting debate among colleagues that was triggered by the simple fact that I shared the official government calendar for 2014.  The Calendar has, as it has had in the previous year, and possibly many years prior to that,  the sub title -  Buddhist Era 2557-2558. This triggered a discussion on whether it was appropriate to have that on the calendar or not.  The argument against seemed to be based on it being seen as an imposition by the State of Buddhism, into areas that are perceived as secular and non-religious. [Though of course, as was pointed out,  the Gregorian Calendar is not really secular at all, based on the fact that it counts the years from the birth of Christ!] What was interesting was that we were having this debate at all.  Obviously, the current context has made us all ultra sensitive to certain issues, and the whole question of a state religion led some of us to be uncomfortable, others to be resentful (not overtly ma...
Read more