Gender and Transport - my International Women's Day thought


Given that it is International Women’s Day, it is probably a good time to reflect on how the transport sector does (or does not) engage with women’s transport needs.  Of course this is not a new subject,  but despite efforts by several women and men, notably in the International Forum for Rural Transport and Development (IFRTD), the World Bank’s SSATP, and other networks interested in bringing some equity into the transport sector, the problem still remains.   Women’s issues, and particularly the issues of  poor urban and rural women,  remain marginal to transport sector planning.  It is not to say that the sector has not progressed.  When, as  the IFRTD’s first Executive Secretary, I presented the Balancing the Load proposal to what was then DFID’s Knowledge and Research (KAR) funding arm in 1996,  I am told the (male) engineers reviewing the proposals laughed at our audacity and dismissed the proposal with hardly a glance. Balancing the Load was subsequently funded by DFID, and  became one of the pioneering pieces of work on gender and transport, followed in the early 1990s and early 2000s with several other initiatives, notably under the patronage of the World Bank and other organisations.  Gender arrived on  the transport agenda.   In 2015, 20 years after the Beijing Conference on women, we should be going beyond Balancing the Load and ensuring that the sector pays considerably more attention to   gender issues in developing transport infrastructure and services.

In 1996,  the focus was on the unequal transport burden between women and men.   Today there are many other issues that we need to consider.

Transport interventions  continue to be based on partial understanding of the difference in trip patterns of women and men.  This is partly because the transport provision rarely takes the care economy into account, focusing its analysis (and resulting policy and programmatic interventions) on the market economy, and conventional, gender insensitive conceptions of what is considered ‘work’. 

The care economy, which involves unpaid household work and  work taking care of other members of the family is dominated by women and girls and is hugely undervalued.  Men do not often have to combine gainful employment with care responsibilities, but to separate the two is to somehow ignore the realities of women’s transport patterns and needs and affects route planning,  provision of ‘off-peak services’ (that in itself a gendered term) and could account for the inability of the transport sector’s analytical frameworks to identify latent transport demand.  

Ignoring the care economy has consequences for how work and living spaces are planned,  providing different challenges to women and to men. Spatial planning also affects the balance between individual and public transport.  Individual modes of transport (cars, motorcycles, bicycles etc) are largely owned by men.   The limited reliability and affordability of public transport is a bigger issue for women.

The whole Road Safety Agenda is also very gendered.  For instance it focuses on road safety and the victims, when it could be broadened to a transport  safety conversation that takes into account safety of other modes (water transport) and other infrastructure (e.g. paths, river crossings) , the impact on care givers, and also bring into the equation issues such as sexual harassment. 

There are issues also in the fact that employment in the transport sector is highly gendered, with few women in positions of decision making. Women can benefit from transport infrastructure projects through involvement in construction activities and receipt of equal pay for equal work. For women providing transport services, there is a need for greater consideration of worker rights, for providing maternity benefits and providing flexible working hours, for reducing sexual harassment and sex stereotyping and  fostering participation in trade unions.  Organisations like the International Transport Workers Federation, have been advocating on these issues.

The above is just a tip of the iceberg.. there are serious issues about women’s participation in, and women’s ability to benefit from, the improvements in transport infrastructure, and it’s about time the transport sector gave serious thought to how they can be addressed.

Comments

  1. Katleen Garcia21 December 2020 at 22:57

    To meet the demands of the growing freight industry, companies should be looking to hire younger women, giving them the opportunity to develop long-term careers in transport. Offering good career development opportunities will help logistics firms attract top talent. Read: https://www.randstad.com.au/hr-news/talent-management/women-in-transport/

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Will change come through red gates?

Image
My former schoolmates are pre-ordering their copy of a coffee-table book entitled Through the Red Gates, a celebratory volume of 125 years of Ladies College, the school we attended on Flower Road, which celebrates this landmark event in 2025.   Some former schoolmates (and others) are also agonising at the possibility that the gates to the country’s governance might turn red with a Malimawa/NPP/Anura Kumara Dissanayake victory in the Presidential election next week.   The fear of a NPP/AKD victory takes several forms: it evokes the spectre of violence of the JVP (the main party in the NPP) forgetting that JVP are not the only perpetrators of terror. The political space, since 1 971 at least, has been seeped in violence - the JVP of the 1980s was particularly vicious, but s uccessive state regimes have unleashed state violence and given head to extra-judicial violent e lements that were equally virulent.   As Lionel Bopage has said in a recent interview , the violence of the JVP (and a
Read more

Some thoughts on the White Saviour Complex of development consultancies

Image
photo taken from  https://e11e99.wordpress.com/2012/10/06/identity-in-a-post-colonial-world/ I am sharing some thoughts that I picked  randomly from a relatively progressive Christian facebook page (Sojourners)that I follow, mainly to help me counter the rather misinformed opinions of my true believer Christian friends (brown not white).  The article is called , 6 HARMFUL CONSEQUENCES OF THE WHITE SAVIOR COMPLEX, BY RYAN KUJA  and is so relevant to the northern development consultancy space that many of my (white) friends and colleagues occupy (and that I too sometimes venture into) that I thought to use it to write a blog post that I can share with that community.   R yan Kuja confesses that he was "never a missionary in the standard sense of the word, never proselytized or attempted to save souls"  but admits that "the engine driving [him] was the white saviour complex..... The other Westerners [he] worked with believed [they] had it all pretty much figur
Read more

Year 2014: Buddhist era 2557-2558

Image
There was an interesting debate among colleagues that was triggered by the simple fact that I shared the official government calendar for 2014.  The Calendar has, as it has had in the previous year, and possibly many years prior to that,  the sub title -  Buddhist Era 2557-2558. This triggered a discussion on whether it was appropriate to have that on the calendar or not.  The argument against seemed to be based on it being seen as an imposition by the State of Buddhism, into areas that are perceived as secular and non-religious. [Though of course, as was pointed out,  the Gregorian Calendar is not really secular at all, based on the fact that it counts the years from the birth of Christ!] What was interesting was that we were having this debate at all.  Obviously, the current context has made us all ultra sensitive to certain issues, and the whole question of a state religion led some of us to be uncomfortable, others to be resentful (not overtly manifest in this conversation)
Read more