Third World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction (WCDRR 2015)



Just returned from the above UN World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction - where I represented Duryog Nivaran, and had two speaking slots: as a panellist at the launch of the Global Assessment Report 2015 and at the Ministerial Roundtable on Governing Disaster Risk: overcoming challenges.  Also worked closely with the Women's Major Group, coordinated by WEDO.  Interesting as UN conferences go, but significant, since its the first of three that are aiming to frame the post-2015 world development agenda - what the world is going to do about disasters, sustainable development and climate. Many interesting thoughts to share... but for now, here is my intervention at the Ministerial Round Table chaired by Ms Maria del Pilar Cornejo, Minister Secretary for Risk Management, Ecuador. 
Displaying DSCN0162.JPG
at the roundtable with the African Union President on my left and the City of Istanbul on my right.
Photo by Ramona Miranda
Good afternoon Ladies and Gentlemen, I represent Duryog Nivaran, South Asian civil society network of people and organisations committed to promoting disaster risk reduction  in what is the world’s most disaster prone region.    
Since our inception in 1995, we have been working directly with people affected by disasters and organisations that represent them, so we welcome the macro level policy and institutional reforms that have been put into place during the period of the HFA., and the commitment to multistakeholder participation that has been evident in the statements of the delegates to this round table.  A little disappointed that there are no South Asian member states represented here.

We would like to reiterate that the way forward is definitely to strengthen  local governance processes. In addition to the more dramatic disaster events, there are the extensive risk factors – the droughts, the floods, the landslides, which are highly localised, but which seriously affect the lives of poor women, men and children,  and these are trending upwards.  Identifying and managing these risks is best done at a local level,  but in many South Asian countries,  local government institutions often don’t have the capacity, the confidence or the power to do this. 

In this context Duryog Nivaran would like to urge member states to:

-INVEST in enabling local government to assess the potential for disaster loss and  damage at local level.  These assessments need to be integrated across sectors, and equally important, they must become an integral component of local development plans.  There will be two gains from this: one is the gain to the local authorities but the other is that the  aggregation of this information could improve the quality of national level data sets

 - ENCOURAGE local governments to dialogue with their constituencies.  Local community organisations can sometimes be captured by the more powerful sections of the communities, so it’s important for local government to talk to the more marginalised members of the communities and to women.    There is a lot of evidence to show that women have a good understanding of disaster risk, and capacity to mitigate this risk and that it is important to include them in all DRR activity.

- PROVIDE RESOURCES for local governments and other data collection agencies to collect and analyse data in a disaggregated manner

-FINALLY, and this is really important, ensure that national and global political considerations do not undermine/override the efforts of local governments to deal with local risks. South Asia is one of the fastest growing economic regions in the world – and we need to mediate our growth with a clear understanding of the risks at the local level.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Will change come through red gates?

Image
My former schoolmates are pre-ordering their copy of a coffee-table book entitled Through the Red Gates, a celebratory volume of 125 years of Ladies College, the school we attended on Flower Road, which celebrates this landmark event in 2025.   Some former schoolmates (and others) are also agonising at the possibility that the gates to the country’s governance might turn red with a Malimawa/NPP/Anura Kumara Dissanayake victory in the Presidential election next week.   The fear of a NPP/AKD victory takes several forms: it evokes the spectre of violence of the JVP (the main party in the NPP) forgetting that JVP are not the only perpetrators of terror. The political space, since 1 971 at least, has been seeped in violence - the JVP of the 1980s was particularly vicious, but s uccessive state regimes have unleashed state violence and given head to extra-judicial violent e lements that were equally virulent.   As Lionel Bopage has said in a recent interview , the violence of the JVP (and a
Read more

Some thoughts on the White Saviour Complex of development consultancies

Image
photo taken from  https://e11e99.wordpress.com/2012/10/06/identity-in-a-post-colonial-world/ I am sharing some thoughts that I picked  randomly from a relatively progressive Christian facebook page (Sojourners)that I follow, mainly to help me counter the rather misinformed opinions of my true believer Christian friends (brown not white).  The article is called , 6 HARMFUL CONSEQUENCES OF THE WHITE SAVIOR COMPLEX, BY RYAN KUJA  and is so relevant to the northern development consultancy space that many of my (white) friends and colleagues occupy (and that I too sometimes venture into) that I thought to use it to write a blog post that I can share with that community.   R yan Kuja confesses that he was "never a missionary in the standard sense of the word, never proselytized or attempted to save souls"  but admits that "the engine driving [him] was the white saviour complex..... The other Westerners [he] worked with believed [they] had it all pretty much figur
Read more

Year 2014: Buddhist era 2557-2558

Image
There was an interesting debate among colleagues that was triggered by the simple fact that I shared the official government calendar for 2014.  The Calendar has, as it has had in the previous year, and possibly many years prior to that,  the sub title -  Buddhist Era 2557-2558. This triggered a discussion on whether it was appropriate to have that on the calendar or not.  The argument against seemed to be based on it being seen as an imposition by the State of Buddhism, into areas that are perceived as secular and non-religious. [Though of course, as was pointed out,  the Gregorian Calendar is not really secular at all, based on the fact that it counts the years from the birth of Christ!] What was interesting was that we were having this debate at all.  Obviously, the current context has made us all ultra sensitive to certain issues, and the whole question of a state religion led some of us to be uncomfortable, others to be resentful (not overtly manifest in this conversation)
Read more