Talking Economics as if people mattered
Spent the best of three days at the 6th SouthAsian Economic Summit hosted by IPS and held at the Cinnamon Grand this
week. Supposed to be the first certified
carbon neutral conference in Sri Lanka, certified as such by the CarbonConsulting Company, and incredibly well organized by IPS, the Conference was a
huge learning experience for me, as well as posing many questions and
challenges.
The number of ‘suited’ South Asian men and the paucity of women
delegates, the overwhelmingly economistic nature of the discussions (okay, so
it is a Economic Summit) that discussed the most populous region in the world
in terminology that only recognized demographics,populations and human capital and not real
women, men and children, all made me somewhat tongue-tied and
uncomfortable. I was constantly being
challenged to recognize the carbon neutrality of the event because more often
than not, the breakout rooms were freezing, so was really pleased that Selima
Ahmed, Founder President of the Bangladesh Women’s Chamber of Industry and
Commerce, challenged delegates' inability to walk the talk and suggested we open the
curtains and regulate the airconditioning.
Made me think, it needed a woman to do that. But it also made me wonder whether carbon
neutrality is a cop out, allowing users who can afford to pay, to maintain detrimental
consumption patterns and lifestyles.
Tried to suggest to Sanith de S Wijeyeratne, Chief Operating Officer of
the Carbon Consulting Company, that this could have been an opportunity to
influence the Cinnamon Grand but realised I was irritating him by my insistence. It would seem that the only visible
concession that the hotel has made to a change in practice has been to replace
bottled water with water jugs – but given the number of people and sessions, this
has probably had a bigger impact than it would seem at face value.
So what was I doing here?
IPS in a rare moment invited me to present in the session on Managing Intra-country growth disparities,
probably expecting some self-selection into the gender disparities parallel
session (which, according to organizer, Anushka Wijesinha, was only attended by women delegates and no men, sigh!) which I rejected and got
myself answering questions on ‘managing urbanization inclusively’. More about what I said in a subsequent post…
need to go see what the final sessions are like, especially to see how Professor RehmanSobhan deals with G L Pieris!
Comments
Post a Comment